A 64-bit computer represents the first viable upgrade from Windows XP for computer users in many ways. Processors capable of referencing larger address spaces provide the opportunity to use more physical memory than ever before, potentially reducing the overhead spent moving processes in and out of physical memory. However, all 64-bit versions of Microsoft operating systems currently impose a 16 TB limit on address space and allow no more than 128 GB of physical memory due to the impracticality of having 16 TB of RAM. Mobile software development processes created on 64-bit versions of Windows are allotted 8 TB in virtual memory for user processes and 8 TB for kernel processes to create a virtual memory of 16 TB.
The transition to the 64-bit architecture is driven by the limitations of the architecture in terms of memory. Applications running on a 64-bit edition of Windows should theoretically experience improved performance because of the larger quantity of available memory. Much like the advantage offered by increasing physical memory in a 32-bit system, the larger memory space on 64-bit versions of Windows Vista and Windows 7 allows more processes to actively reside in the system RAM simultaneously. It allows users to add additional RAM beyond the previous 4 GB limit, up to the amount supported by the main board. This change potentially reduces time spent loading and switching between processes, a condition that can lead to all the processor’s efforts spent merely in loading and switching between threads. To harvest the benefits of a 64-bit operating system such as Windows Vista x64 Edition, you should invest in a large amount of RAM like 4 GB or more and a compatible motherboard. For 64-bit version of Windows, Microsoft also requires a digital signature on all drivers. By requiring new, signed drivers, Microsoft aims to reduce failures and improve stability by shining a spotlight on vendor responsibility for bugs. With 32-bit version of Windows, administrators can install unsigned drivers, but Microsoft continues to discourage their use.
While 64-bit architectures working with large data sets in applications developed using custom software development techniques such as digital video, scientific computing, and large databases easier, there has been considerable debate as to whether they or their 32-bit compatibility modes will be faster than comparably-priced 32-bit systems for other tasks. A compiled Java program can run on a 32 bit or 64 bit Java virtual machine without modification. The lengths and precision of all the built in types are specified by the standard and are not dependent on the underlying architecture. Java programs that run on a 64 bit Java virtual machine have access to a larger address space. Speed is not the only factor to consider in a comparison of 32-bit and 64-bit processors. Applications such as multi-tasking, stress testing, and clustering may be more suited to a 64-bit architecture when deployed appropriately. 64-bit clusters have been widely deployed in large organizations which are into outsourcing software development services such as IBM, HP and Microsoft, for this reason of multi-tasking.
Author Resource:
Nick Thomas is the author of this article. He has been writing articles for many custom software development related organizations like Q3 technologies. Moreover, he has been actively involved in providing useful content writing material related to http://casestudies.q3tech.com>mobile software development .
For more details, feel free to visit http://www.q3tech.com