Summarizing power relativity imposes social dynamics, explained by the concepts of relativity and comprehensiveness of power. Social mobility encourages internal and external procedures to continuously review and evaluate information, taking as long as the reference point which is the permanent strategic interests and objectives.
The second factor relates to the weaknesses or vulnerabilities. Specify which involves risk and potential disadvantages or present, requires a task that has a frame of reference in making decisions, capacity and time.
The power, in modern times, is once again the thread to decipher the questions it presents the international arena and the prospects are in sight in international relations today. Clearly, the social, economic, political, cultural and technological developments of recent decades have brought to the forefront of theoretical discussions which will assume the profile of international society of the future.
In integrative and disintegrative tendencies of globalization and interdependence, accumulate the effects of the global action of not governmental political organizations tend, in apparent contradiction to erode the traditional character of sovereignty, in the existence of nation state.
Although, curiously, both Marxism and liberalism proposed by the Trilateral Commission not to mention Milton and Rose Friedman pointed their arrows towards the end of the state and the disappearance of territorial boundaries and political borders is predicting an end to which, in my opinion, it still remains a long time to come.
The state remains the principal actor in international relations in all areas. The levels of influence and multinational private participation in the global economic transactions, makes the state organization the key of the leadership role for the construction of future scenarios.
The existence of modern state institutions to ensure conditions of security in all spheres of social, political and economic, is still valid and necessary.
Obviously, the sense of state, government, society and individual is different from 50 years ago. The plurality of actors and interests within a country and the influence of other external actors and interests within a political system become more complex and dynamic exercise essential State: reconciling the partial interests in the common interest.
It involves eventualities that could arise as a result of implementing a development model. That is, the result of feedback processes that arise when the system responds to the demands of the different actors, and the modification or alteration of some of the static factors, among which are the geographical aspects (topography, climate, etc.). geopolitical (location hemispheric, regional and bilateral), legal (legal framework) and organizational Administrative (shape and form of government).
Given these trends, an inclusive concept of national security, renovated and distinct from the profile of confrontation and conflict that characterized it during the cold war, it can be assumed as the factor of political interpretation and to enable the State to deal with more baggage instrumental the current scenario.
The optimization of technical procedures on better terms that will link theory and practice of national security, through the strategic use of own resources of national power. This is b the most important revision is being made to the traditional criteria of sovereignty and security, in the proper context of the modern state. The translation of national interest objectives give a frame of reference both the beginning and the horizon of the planning process of state policies and the assessment of political action, will allow better utilization of the overall capacity of the state in the four fields of power that can be analyzed methodological and conventionally this matter.
On the theoretical ground of my hypothesis, I believe that the realistic approach of power persists because despite the power is in itself a difficult concept to test by traditional scientific criteria for me when you cannot exercise the politics without state power. Nor do I believe that the international situation can be properly interpreted from a different approach than the Theory of State and political realism.
Realism school that was addressed in this document helps to prove my hypothesis also high. Strengthens the perspective of power and supports the methodological in defining policies and strategies. In turn, the strategic planning process helped us better understand those factors in terms national and international situation, not just government, which affect the definition of policies, strategies and performance evaluation.
This is the new concept of power politics, which goes directly into the schemes of foreign policy and international actions, including intervention, to characterize the stage of international reality in the coming years.
![[Valid RSS feed]](http://www.look4articles.com/images/icon_Rss.png "XML Feed For RSS"){kind=icon}
Category Rss Feed
Print This Article
Add To Favorites
![[Valid RSS feed]](http://www.look4articles.com/images/rss.jpg "XML Feed For RSS")