Researching your arguments and having them at hand is one thing. Organizing them to ensure the most effective results is another.
The Toulmin Method of Logic is a popular formula for presenting your arguments in a persuasive or opinion piece. This is frequently use by writers who add up some logic in their writing. It is very important to learn this method especially when you deal complex situations and needs a supporting evidence to very your statement most importantly, when you are writing arguments in a written or spoken piece. Since you are dealing with arguments which are the most significant type in making your sentence meaningful and life on it, applying this method will be an easy thing for you to learn and make your piece an effective one.
It’s also one of the simplest and most easy to use, which spurs most people to employ it in their own work. Needless to say, we implore you to use a grammar checking software to ensure that your arguments go through convincingly, as nothing stops a good argument dead in its tracks than poor writing. As you can see, most readers love to finish reading you writing if it has provided them with such interest. Avoid making your readers feel bored but if that happens, they might even skip your content from reading. If you are quite satisfied with the essence of applying this method to your vocation and to please your readers, then know how to start writing using Toulmin Method of Logic.
How does it work? Here’s the basic formula for presenting an argument, in order:
o Claim
o Data
o Bridge
o Backing
o Counterclaim
o Rebuttal
The claim is the main object of your argument. Data involves all the evidence you gathered to support that claim. If you claim that “Veganism lessens your environmental footprint,” then your statistics of the amount of CO2 that the processing of meat produces in the atmosphere is a data that helps you back up the thesis.
The bridge is the explanation of how the data supports the claim. Continuing the example, you can state that “Veganism eliminates the use of processed meat products, thereby eliminating the added CO2 released into the atmosphere.” Backing represents additional logic that supports the bridge, such as comparing the amount of gases produced by an SUV for twelve months, compared to the potential gases released by eating meat everyday for the same period.
A counterclaim is an argument that disagrees with your own claim. Why add it in? The idea is to quell the objection, before the reader even gets the chance to raise it. For instance, you can say that, “Some people will argue that eating vegetables leave environmental footprints, too.” But, you’ll rebut this counterclaim, by putting forward that “Growing vegetables in your yard, releases only a small percentage of the CO2 produced in meat production, effectively reducing the amount of gases you produce as an individual.” You can include additional evidence for a stronger rebuttal.
Author Resource:
Find out how to write perfect English letters, reports and emails by writing less. See Grammar Checking Software in action! http://www.grammarsoftware.com
![[Valid RSS feed]](http://www.look4articles.com/images/icon_Rss.png "XML Feed For RSS"){kind=icon}
Category Rss Feed
Print This Article
Add To Favorites
![[Valid RSS feed]](http://www.look4articles.com/images/rss.jpg "XML Feed For RSS")