Each state has its own laws concerning punishment for the crime of driving under the influence, but thanks to MADD (Mothers Against Drunk Driving), there is now a federal law that says that the legal blood alcohol limit is BAC .08 (it was BAC .10).
MADD was originally against promoting a designated driver simply because the organization felt that it would encourage those who were not designated drivers to drink a lot more, but they did change their position. A designated driver is a plan that does work.
When a group of folks are out partying and having enjoyable, nobody is likely to be thinking about what the law against driving from point A to point B is right after numerous drinks have been consumed. So the concept of having a designated driver appointed before the party begins, when everybody is clear-headed and sober, actually can be a good idea.
You will find many complaints and discussions about the punishment for the crime of driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol. Most of those complaints center on the reality that judges are given an excellent deal of leeway in setting punishment. One judge may only levy community service for an instance of drunk driving, although yet another might set jail time, fines, and permanent loss of a driver's license for the exact same crime. Those that get the harsher sentences are the ones who complain.
There is not significantly doubt that punishment guidelines must be set for judges to adhere to for the crime of driving under the influence. I believe that those guidelines will probably be legislated in the near future -- not in all states, but in numerous.
Nonetheless, regardless of how harsh or light the punishment is for driving under the influence, it's still a crime. Accidents happen. People are killed or seriously injured. The best answer is simply not to drive under the influence.
Author Resource:
This article is courtesy of Auto District, automotive classifieds featuring trucks for sale , including used cars .