Bar stools on sale critics who didnt take hold of the Warners sequel, THRs Todd McCarthy lamented the films "barely-there screenplay, " which failed to be able to "yield even fleeting minutes of awe. "
Wrath of the Titans will likely slash its way to your $30 million opening weekend, but can it slay the doubts in the critics?
With a Rotten Acidic tomatoes rating of just 24%, the Warner Bros. sequel rates even less than Clash of the Titans, which scored a 28% on the tomato-meter two years ago. Clash went on to help earn nearly $500 million in the global box office, despite its poor crucial response.
Set ten years immediately after Clash, the new film sees demigod Perseus (Sam Worthington) with a journey to rescue the father Zeus (Liam Neeson) via his uncle Hades (Ron Fiennes).
The Hollywood Reporters Todd McCarthy accepted the films 3D was much better than its predecessors, but lamented that their "barely-there screenplay, " failed to "yield perhaps fleeting moments of amaze. "
PHOTOS: Wrath of the Titans Stars Sam Worthington, Liam Neeson Step Out for Big apple Premiere
He also took issue with all the characterization of the films gods.
"As so many types of Greek myths and the gods actions existed also in ancient times, one cant take issue while using the way theyre employed, " McCarthy wrote, "other than to be aware that the gods here, claiming undue neglect simply by humans, behave like petulant mercenaries because anxious to fight as some kid may be to play a gaming. "
Rolling Stones Peter Travers wasted virtually no time to bash Wrath, opening his review using this wonderfully Homer-esque line: "This feeble followup to 2010s godawful Clash of the Titans sucketh the mighty big one. "
The review only acquired uglier from there.
"Director Jonathan Liebesman, guilty of inflicting Battle Los angeles on an unsuspecting state, keeps the incompetence arriving with incontinent glee, " Travers wrote.
VIDEO: Wrath of the Titans Debuts Brand new Trailer Featuring Bigger, Badder Battles
In his two-star evaluate, Chicago Sun-Times critic Roger Ebert criticized the films dim lighting effects, made worse by 3d. For Ebert, the 3D exemplified the films addiction to visual fireworks without a having the basics of a great film down.
"I found myself asking yourself, just for the heck of computer, how the movie may have played with a much more traditional approach, " Ebert wrote. "You know. Literate, concise dialogue. Characters we care concerning, with relationships that have meaning for individuals. Action set-pieces within well-established spatial boundaries. Pacing that doesnt hurtle past us faster compared to the human ability to develop interest. You know, that kind of material. "
Even as the critics have got banded together to avoid Wrath, they seem resigned that your Titans threequel will be coming in a few years.
STORY: Wrath of the Titans Director Assumes Ninja Turtles
Writing for the Los angeles Times, Mark Olsen characterized the film in a sequel factory, endlessly pumping out product no matter quality.
![[Valid RSS feed]](http://www.look4articles.com/images/icon_Rss.png "XML Feed For RSS"){kind=icon}
Category Rss Feed
Print This Article
Add To Favorites
![[Valid RSS feed]](http://www.look4articles.com/images/rss.jpg "XML Feed For RSS")