One in all the seminal but maybe least referenced books on strategy is Henry Mintzberg's "The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning". As the title suggests, the book's central theme considerations the limitations of strategy and strategic planning. Unless these limitations are understood, strategists and planners are doomed to repeat many of the errors of the past.
Anyone who has scan the book could be forgiven for concluding that even to embark on a technique project is a positive approach to court disillusionment or even disaster. Despite its apparent academic approach - for example, there are 27 pages of citations - the book is readable and persuasive, and contains several golden gems of strategic insight, from the World War I trenches of Passchendaele to Sam Steinberg's idiosyncratic but successful approaches to supermarket development in 1950's Canada.
Recently, I re-browse two of the foremost significant chapters of this book, handling the pitfalls and fallacies of strategic planning.
Mintzberg dissects the pitfalls of strategy-creating exercises and then goes on to present the three fundamental fallacies: the fallacy of formalization, the fallacy of detachment and the fallacy of predetermination. This discussion takes up forty% of the entire book, illustrating the importance that Mintzberg attaches to understanding and managing the things which will go wrong with strategy.
One plan that emerges from these chapters is that creating a vision includes a much higher track record than making a strategic plan. The reason has to try to to with several of the restrictions of strategy setting: strategies tend, ultimately to be constraining, and require agreement thoroughly by a massive collective. In follow, this can paralyze action. Vision, Mintzberg says, will prove a bigger incentive to action than a set up that is more formally constrained.
But, Mintzberg's concept of vision is one that "emerges from the head of single leader, instead of having to be agreed by upon collectively by a group of senior managers and planners". This idea of vision sounds dated. Indeed, the very act of creating a vision will be the unifying force that inspires a core team over the numerous years throughout which the vision is being pursued.
Visions aren't the identical as strategies. Visions ought to own a abundant longer term bias. I have found that firms talk of horizons of no more than 3-five years when strategy is discussed and dismiss long term thinking as being of very little value. However it's this longer-term, visionary thinking - conceived over a minimum of a 10 year horizon - that is usually essential in enabling many of the solutions to a corporation's future to be realised.
Why visioning is vital to your strategic thinking
There are three reasons why such long run thinking is each profitable and necessary.
1. A vision inspires and motivates
The primary reason is one touched on by Mintzberg: a vision, if well done, conjures up and motivates folks to pursue a goal. A vision that helps individuals perceive what they are striving for yet as the broad changes that are needed to bring it regarding is a powerful force.
This power to inspire and inspire is very important as a result of all strategic plans can, once they're in execution, suffer at some point from lack of focus and commitment. The motivational power of the vision is a robust force that strategy leaders can rely on to re-invigorate the team and also the organisation when everyone's resolve begins to falter.
2. A vision provides a language
Second, making a vision means that that those involved develop a distinct language that enables them to talk concerning the future they aspire to. This language - the precise words and phrases - describes the important concepts embodied within the vision. For example, within the mid-'90s a high-street UK bank wished to develop a 10-year vision for cash transmission - what a comprehensive banking service would look like for the movement of both retail and wholesale funds between, and to customers and monetary institutions, and the way to attain it.
At the time, the Net and electronic payment schemes were only being talked about. Nevertheless, these technology developments were suggesting that, to be effective within the business of managing cash transfers, new long-term shifts in capability would be necessary. Several of these capabilities related to technologies that had not then been invented, like those for Net security.
One of the key edges of the visioning exercise was that the core team involved developed a brand new language for discussing this future world. The importance of this came home to me some time later. The new language meant, as an example, that participants, meeting in an exceedingly corridor a year later, could easily and quickly slip into conversation about, say, a replacement security initiative that was to be part of the vision. The language captured the necessary features of the new world, and while not it, staff in elements of the bank that had not been part of the visioning method found it difficult to contribute effectively.
3. Vision permits large scale modification
Thirdly, strategic plans frequently underestimate the trouble and timescale involved in creating massive change. When the goal being aimed toward necessitates major modification, a vision provides a framework that makes the individual steps more understandable and manageable. Organisations can manage the changes over long-enough time periods that enable employees familiarize yourself with what's needed.
In the instance mentioned above, the vision suggested that large-scale shifts in the skills of the bank would be required. In today's world, where financial establishments must grapple with complicated technology problems like security and identity fraud, it's clear that the main target, 10 years ago, on understanding "what we tend to want to become good at" proved to be critical. Only by imagining the world that was returning could the deep skills needed nowadays be gradually put in place.
Visioning is not a substitute for detailed planning. It is a key approach that is used to inspire and inspire, to provide a language for discussing the longer term, and to enable required large-scale modification to be successfully implemented.
Author Resource:
Riley Jones has been writing articles online for nearly 2 years now. Not only does this author specialize in Vision, you can also check out his latest website about:
![[Valid RSS feed]](http://www.look4articles.com/images/icon_Rss.png "XML Feed For RSS"){kind=icon}
Category Rss Feed
Print This Article
Add To Favorites
![[Valid RSS feed]](http://www.look4articles.com/images/rss.jpg "XML Feed For RSS")