If G-d promised you a gift, would you hesitate? Would you even dare to criticize it and reject it? Nevertheless, the meraglim, the spies that were sent to Eretz Yisroel, came with a negative report, one that spoke poorly regarding the Land and declared disbelief that the Jewish individuals may inherit it. While there are many explanations for this puzzling and tragic episode that condemned us to 40 years of wandering in the desert and established future national calamities (Taanis 29a), there is a glaring lesson that we tend to will apply in our own lives. That lesson is that the art of constructive criticism. It's an art because it demands a lot of talent, knowledge, and sensitivity.
As we see from the beginning of the parasha, it is even questionable on whether one ought to offer criticism in the first place. Commenting on the seemingly superfluous language of "shlach lecha" (send for yourself), Rashi explains that "for yourself" means that in line with your (Moshe's) intention. G-d had not commanded Moshe to send spies to scout out the land. G-d promised that the Jewish folks would posses it. It had been only when the Jewish folks approached Moshe with the request to scout out the land, that G-d acquiesced. Nevertheless, He made it clear that this wasn't His initiative. G-d didn't raise for our feedback, however we insisted on fixing our own "2 cents".
Though in general, we ought to not be quick to produce criticism, there might be things that warrant it or when our feedback is really solicited. In these cases, we should apply the art of constructive criticism, or what I prefer to decision feedback. When the meraglim returned from spying out the land, they spoke poorly of Eretz Yisroel. They told of its supposed shortcomings and drew the conclusion that it would be not possible to beat it and survive there as it's a "land that devours its inhabitants (13:thirty two)". However Calev, who along with Yehoshua was half of the mission, presented a wholly completely different approach, "we tend to shall surely ascend and conquer it for we tend to will surely do it (thirteen:30)." Tova haaretz m'od m'od (fourteen:seven)" "The Land is terribly, very good." They all witnessed the identical land, however the meraglim experienced it through a completely different lens, that of the crucial eye. When the important eye is one amongst negativity, when it's an ayin ra'a ( a unhealthy eye) vs an ayin tova (a sensible eye), the result will be devastating and demoralizing.
Criticism is only positive when it's constructive, when it builds up an individual, not when it tears one down. When I was doing post graduate training in Imago Relationship Therapy, we were needed to indicate tapes of our work with couples to our trainer. They were to be evaluated and if we have a tendency to had met the factors we have a tendency to would pass. It had been a touch nerve-racking and vulnerable to determine ourselves on camera and be evaluated by a group. One factor that struck me about the feedback method was the protection and encouragement it provided. We tend to knew as amateurs that our tapes wouldn't be flawless and we tend to were wanting for feedback that we tend to could implement to boost our work. Everyone in the space provided feedback: what I liked about your work, a technical suggestion, and the way I see you going in your "growth edge." Any criticism was prefaced with appreciations or positive statements. An individual needs to be built up and feel good regarding what they did. The technical suggestions were specific and practical. This is crucial as someone should recognize what they did wrong and what they will change. General abstract criticism of the person's very being or of things they're unable to alter is unhelpful and probably damaging. Finally, the "growth edge", what a wonderful method to label it! Instead of labeling what we have a tendency to are doing wrong and not providing any area for improvement, we tend to read it from a positive angle. I learned that feedback should be given in a supportive manner thus the person realizes what they have to enhance and is inspired to try to to therefore instead of focusing on the negative, bursting their bubble and leaving them helpless and unable to determine any rationality in the feedback.
One must walk away feeling sensible and confident about what was done right and motivated to improve. We ask for feedback to add more objectivity so as to take a step back and see what 'really happened'. I feel that we all have the need to grow and would gladly welcome any feedback that assists us in that process. Though we tend to must bear in mind that any criticism we have a tendency to receive continues to be somebody's else opinion and that our self-worth or performance is not hooked in to another's approval, the ego is very fragile, and there's a robust would like to feel safe and supported.
So, it is crucial that any criticism given be constructive, to create, not to tear down. This is a fragile art for whether or not we are not malicious, we tend to tend to look at the negative. The essential eye should be an ayin tova, unlike that of the meraglim.
Whereas the meraglim failed to want to deny their own fears, they might have looked at matters during a a lot of positive lightweight, found the nice within the 'dangerous', and drawn a different conclusion. If not given with sensitivity and wisdom, criticism will be very destructive. Besides what they said, they influenced others to follow in their negativity and caused the Jewish individuals to induce nowhere, wandering for forty years within the desert, and for that generation, never reaching their supposed destination. When criticism is not given with care, it will terribly simply sidetrack a person and leave them feeling lost and discouraged.
Next time once we are in a very scenario that warrants feedback, let us have the sensitivity to view with an ayin tov, providing specific details and practical suggestions with the intent to make up the other person therefore they can be inspired to grow and improve. Solely in that way will we tend to become totally self-actualized, in a position to achieve our personal Eretz Yisroel.
Author Resource:
Jeff Patterson has been writing articles online for nearly 2 years now. Not only does this author specialize in Critical Care, you can also check out his latest website about
![[Valid RSS feed]](http://www.look4articles.com/images/icon_Rss.png "XML Feed For RSS"){kind=icon}
Category Rss Feed
Print This Article
Add To Favorites
![[Valid RSS feed]](http://www.look4articles.com/images/rss.jpg "XML Feed For RSS")