In the realm of ethical decision-making, familiarity breeds a kind of ethical stability. In other words, as long as the people, cultural setting, values and problems are comparatively known to those involved, then the sorts of ethical decisions those individuals are needed to make will be sufficiently familiar for them to try to to thus in comparatively manageable ways. Being ethical will be neither too difficult nor too difficult for them to understand. Thus, ethical familiarity breeds ethical stability.
Newness and modification, however, will breed a quite moral instability. When new folks enter the setting bringing a terribly different culture and a somewhat completely different set of values, and having different customs and practices, then it's doubtless that new issues can arise among and between both groups. The meeting and interchange between and among the principles and processes familiar to these teams is where the difficulties arise. To use a different vocabulary, this can be a conflict between their principles and processes.
Ethical Principles are the values and preferences of a group as imagined, articulated and understood. They expect that every one the normal activities of life revolve around them. They really see and understand the truth of the planet from the perspective of those values and preferences. As an example, a group can articulate just how abundant and what types of assertive behaviors are allowed (e.g., organized sports) and that ones are outlawed (e.g., gladiatorial combat & dueling to the death).
Ethical Processes are the ways in which in which moral selections are made. This includes how the ethical principles and issues are perceived, how they're analyzed, how the principles are applied and how competing principles are seen in relationship to every other. As an example the traditional Oath of Hippocrates "to not administer a poison nor to advocate such a course" looks clear, and yet, in trendy medical observe "chemo-therapy" is precisely that, the administration of poison, however in an exceedingly controlled and prudent manner for the nice health of the patient. Indeed, the Hippocratic Oath has modified with time. Clearly competent health care professionals had to actively engage a moral dilemma, analyze the facts, and with nice info and imagination, devise and risk a new course of action. Hence, massive changes will return about, however ideally after all, only with careful, accountable, competent and cheap engagement by all concerned.
The Reality of Ethical Evolution and Revolution: The method of applying principles can be something from simple and simple to most complicated and difficult. Circumstances and things demand a nuanced appreciation for several ethical issues. That's why civilizations have developed classes or professions of judges of all sorts (e.g., the judiciary, boards of review, and umpires in athletic contests) who spend their time studying, practicing, reviewing, assessing, weighing and deciding inside the contexts of real-life issues. It's from simply such issues as these that principles and processes are sometimes found to meet their limits as a result of of changes in circumstances, things, information and popular ethical insight and acceptance. Some moral principles and processes formerly thought of moral become unethical (e.g., those permitting for slavery and polygamy, and vigilante law enforcement and dueling, respectively). Some principles and processes formerly considered unethical become ethical (e.g., charging interest on loans, and economic capitalism and chemo-therapy, respectively). And to create things even more complicated, there often develops a rationale for exceptions to the ordinary ethical norm.
For the numerous ethics systems of principles and processes to be healthy, meaningful and manageable, each principles and processes must be in constant states of development, evolution and revolution. Thus, we have a tendency to must avoid taking refuge in a very few most well-liked principles in order to avoid healthy growth or genuinely new issues. We should conjointly beware of changing into thus shallow and unhealthy as to possess simplistic or silly principles. Likewise, we tend to should reform and revise ethical processes (even some ancient ones) a number of whose effectiveness have diminished and even become damaging (e.g., tribal prejudices, cultural hatreds and superstitious beliefs) in the various twenty first Century, cosmopolitan, multicultural ethical frames of reference. (Yes, there are many healthy ethical systems in the world.) And, we have a tendency to should avoid having ethical processes which are so much too sophisticated for ordinary society members to know, understand and realize effective in standard daily life. All ethics is personal. The ultimate moral question is how both the collective society and society's individual members are helped by the ethical principles and ethical processes we tend to embrace and use.
Author Resource:
Jeff Patterson has been writing articles online for nearly 2 years now. Not only does this author specialize in Ethics, you can also check out his latest website about
![[Valid RSS feed]](http://www.look4articles.com/images/icon_Rss.png "XML Feed For RSS"){kind=icon}
Category Rss Feed
Print This Article
Add To Favorites
![[Valid RSS feed]](http://www.look4articles.com/images/rss.jpg "XML Feed For RSS")