What are the elements of your quintessential medieval sword? Is there a traditional medieval sword? This matter I sense is more of an individual viewpoint rather then objective fact. I can speak only for myself. If I was to try and explain my vision of a standard sword from the middle ages it might have to satisfy numerous standard criteria.
First, just how typical was the layout throughout the medieval period as outlined by the current evidence we've got? To get a medieval sword of the classical time period I would say that its main attributes would must be from the most typical selection in relation to its fashion and design. 2nd, what is the quality and amount of surviving examples? It should be clear that a sizable quantity of greater high quality examples may well indicate how well-liked the total layout was. And thirdly, but not least in value, how easy was it to assemble? Ease of development may at times indicate a better frequency of production.
The wheel pommel looks to dominate throughout the medieval period each on surviving examples and in depictions of time period artwork, so my medieval sword would certainly must have a wheel pommel.
Despite the fact that I love medieval longswords, I need to say that single-handed swords have been seemingly far more common between the vast array of medieval swords and as a result the standard medieval sword needs to be single-handed when we're dealing with an ubiquitous style of that era. For that reason, I assume the grip would should be of the tapered profile from guard to pommel and should be covered in leather. The guard by itself would have to be designed on the foundation of basic and utilitarian parameters for ease of manufacture and overall practicality of assembly. As a result, an easy bar tapered from the center out for the tip is undeniably one of the most suitable for any medieval sword design and style.
The sword blade would very particularly have to be about thirty two inches in length and about two inches in width. As outlined by the historical report, this would appear to be about average for just about any single-handed medieval sword.
I assume my medieval sword would should have a fuller about two-thirds of the length from the blade to further be typical of what we think of when it comes to middle age sword design parameters. Various individuals persist in claiming that the fuller served being a "blood grove" thats goal was to break the suction of the wound. In reality the fuller raises the stiffness of wider blades and it allows a blade to possess a thicker edge for toughness and sturdiness.
A gentle blade taper towards the tip to serve the wielder effectively in thrusting also as cutting. This will likely serve to fight an extensive array of opponents. Within this regard there must be sufficient breadth at the position to provide for your delivery of an helpful reduce along with a longitudinal mid-rib, producing the blade stiff and resilient to bending.
A light distal taper to help the stability and handling can be necessary, but it shouldn't become too thin at the tip. My sword would should weigh right close to two and a fifty percent to two and 3 quarter pounds. Sturdy and robust but light and balanced for ease of use and finesse. My medieval sword would need to possess a wooden cored scabbard wrapped in leather which has a metal chape and locke and a sturdy leather belt for ease and comfort in carrying.
I can only say that this can be an absolutely arbitrary set of standards and consists solely of my viewpoint. My preferred sword style is one thing a little distinct as I indicated, but this may be said to signify simply my thought about what a typical medieval sword ought to be in terms of layout.
![[Valid RSS feed]](http://www.look4articles.com/images/icon_Rss.png "XML Feed For RSS"){kind=icon}
Category Rss Feed
Print This Article
Add To Favorites
![[Valid RSS feed]](http://www.look4articles.com/images/rss.jpg "XML Feed For RSS")