When one speaks about Leadership designs, there are many different models to settle on from. However, no matter the model it is never an straightforward method to implement or observe a explicit style of leadership and hope to get the results that was intended. "Leadership" per se is both an Art along with a Science. The one key component that every one leaders ought to possess is their ability to speak their visions and values to the individuals they're leading and to get the individuals to shop for into their visions and values.
The key concern is whether the leader is obtaining his folks to 'buy-in' or is he trying to 'sell' his vision. When you wish to 'sell' you wish to be convincing and provide the impression that the ideas you have are inherently helpful to the folks and thus they should settle for it. This sometimes could be a difficult dilemma as sometimes the folks you are leading might more or less see the relevance of your visions and values and might not be forthcoming in accepting them. But, if you are able to create the circumstances whereby the individuals feel that what you possess are vital visions and values, which by they shopping for into these it might benefit them well, you've got created a winning formula to guide your people successfully.
If you would like your folks to 'purchase-in' instead of 'sell' your visions and values you wish to pay meticulous attention to the type of leadership vogue that you simply portray. I personally find that in this context, leadership can be classified either as autocratic leadership vogue or a consultative leadership style.
Autocratic Leadership Style
Autocratic leadership is one that is predicated on a clear high-down approach. The leader is in a position of absolute power and he will implement and do whatever he needs to get things done. Usually in an autocratic leadership setting there can not be abundant discussion of affairs because the individuals realize that their voices does not carry weight in the problem solving and call creating aspects of their organization.
An autocratic leader can be the driver of his people and while not his leadership the organization will not be able to function. Usually autocratic leaders wish to delegate their power but at the identical time having a stranglehold on all those subordinate to them. They also like to educate their people to try and do things the way they want it and could produce a 'my way or the highway' reasonably operating environment. The impression one gets in an autocratic leadership style is that the leader is seen as some quite megalomaniacal tyrant to be feared and followed.
Though there's some truth to this, autocratic leadership is not necessarily a dangerous style. In fact there are some circumstances where an autocratic leadership ought to be the popular style. One instance where autocratic leadership style might be applicable is when the organization is new and therefore the individuals are inexperience and therefore research to the leadership to guide them in their work. Another instance is if the individuals are disengaged in their job and don't have any clear direction and there is vast internal politicking of the kind that is disruptive and causes an emotional strain within the approach the organization is being managed. Here a robust autocratic leadership may help to re-align the organization to its original position and get the individuals back in shape.
The downside of all this can be that an extended period of partaking in an autocratic vogue of leadership will strain the relationship between the leader and the people in that the people may realize the leader to be so task-oriented that they may develop a sense of resentment. Additional, when the leader becomes too autocratic he could forget that he's handling humans and not machines and would possibly produce the impression that the folks are simply part of the machinery. This will produce a sense of dissonance in the work atmosphere that will not be helpful to the leader, the individuals and the organization within the long run. Take the cue from Dwight D. Eisenhower who said: "You do not lead by hitting individuals over the pinnacle - that's assault, not leadership"
Author Resource:
Bob has been writing articles online for nearly 2 years now. Not only does this author specialize in Autocratic vs Consultative Leadership, you can also check out his latest website about:
Popular Wedding Flowers Which reviews and lists the best
White Flowers Wedding
![[Valid RSS feed]](http://www.look4articles.com/images/icon_Rss.png "XML Feed For RSS"){kind=icon}
Category Rss Feed
Print This Article
Add To Favorites
![[Valid RSS feed]](http://www.look4articles.com/images/rss.jpg "XML Feed For RSS")