Besides, one knows terribly well that art cannot take the place of a divine Creator. Where is God in all this? For many dedicated artists, God does not exist, or at best his or her or its existence is in question. Are those artists religious? Can one be religious and not believe in a very divine Creator? One will have character. One can have scruples and be a solid citizen. Is that religious? I might assume so. However is it spirituality? Is it a spiritual path? Maybe. Maybe not.
Will dedication to a profession create a religious path? Not all artists are professionals. Making cash has nothing to do with it. One would possibly say that the professional artist has dedicated himself to art in the manner a monk, priest, or nun has dedicated him or herself to God. Here one must examine the love of the profession as overriding the need to make money. Here, unusually or not so strangely enough, the profession of artist which of the clergy collide. To own extraordinary passion for ones work: Is that not religious? But is it spirituality? And again, what about God?
What to do here: Outline art and define spirituality and see if they have something in common, see what they need in common and the way closely they resemble every other. For this task, the widest definition of art would be desirable. And therefore for spirituality, the widest definition. I am going to begin with art.
Art is the embodiment of life, that which is real, that which contains the primary forces of consciousness: vision, essence, and flow. Anyone who embraces life can build art. That's what art is regarding: embracing life and making art of that. Artists are human, just like anyone else. They don't perpetually embrace life. But in their art, they need learned how to. The art reflects where they need embraced life. "The trail of the guts," to quote Castenada's Don Juan.
What is spirituality? It's the embracing of life. The non secular path is the trail that permits us to try to to that additional and more. Art is the result of spirituality. Does one doubt this? Is the results of living a non secular life that you're closer to God, additional pious, more holy? Or is the result that you're additional alive and real and stuffed with consciousness? Religion, ritual, and acts of goodness and virtue contribute. But that in itself will not connote spirituality. We have a tendency to grasp terribly well that belief in God does not in itself make a saint. In some unhappy instances, it can propel a sinner to try to to much harm.
The true artist is one who cultivates a non secular path, a minimum of in his art. This is why artists feel such passion and devotion relating to their art: the creation of art becomes integral to the spirituality and spiritual path. While artists have their eye on the goal, or, one goal, that is to create art, others have their eye on living the religious life. They, too, I'd maintain, turn out art. It might or could not return in a very marketable or tangible form. Nevertheless, it is there. To measure a spiritual life is to measure a artistic life, a life that inevitably will turn out art. Notice I said nothing regarding being religious. I said nothing concerning dogma. Religion is hollow without feeling, and feeling comes from the private non secular path, a path which will embrace faith but does not have to.
What I say here might seem a bit odd, to equate the spiritual person with the inventive artist. Let us recall that in other cultures at alternative times, usually it had been the holy man or woman who created icons of worship and taught others the way to experience the divine. I talk of the shamans of recent, and of ancient priests and priestesses. In our gift western culture we have a tendency to have removed a ton of juice from holy rituals, beliefs, customs, and from religion. This is often a mistake. Spirituality and art are certain together. You cannot have one without the other. So, those artists who don't listen to their soul and respond suffer. And spiritualists who deny their creativity conjointly suffer. Art and spirituality are one.
Why Do We have a tendency to Must Apply Being Spiritual?
Have you ever questioned why we have a tendency to those folks on a religious path are told to possess a "practice"? Imagine if we tend to all joined a non secular team and got together each day for practice. What would we have a tendency to do? Would we run prayer sprints? Would we tend to stretch our beliefs? Would we scrimmage different religions? Truth be told, observe is just as vital to changing into a non secular person as it is to turning into a great soccer player, swimmer or baseball player.
A religious practice is much like an athletic apply except the main focus lies on turning into a lot of non secular - additional open to religious experiences, to connecting with our Higher Self or God, to tapping into the flow of Divine Energy - instead of on changing into a higher athlete. Just as the physical athlete must stretch and strengthen his muscles, religious athletes should stretch and strengthen their ability to quiet their minds, open to their non secular nature, sense the part of themselves that is connected to the Divine, and experience a unity with All That Is. Whereas some people have a non secular or mystical expertise without making an attempt, the vast majority of individuals must exert effort daily to get just a little bit nearer to feeling even a obscure sense of something that may be known as "spiritual."
Author Resource:
Link :
Barbara K Howard has been writing articles online for nearly 2 years now. Not only does this author specialize in Spirituality, you can also check out his latest website about:
![[Valid RSS feed]](http://www.look4articles.com/images/icon_Rss.png "XML Feed For RSS"){kind=icon}
Category Rss Feed
Print This Article
Add To Favorites
![[Valid RSS feed]](http://www.look4articles.com/images/rss.jpg "XML Feed For RSS")