Film photography was invariably called just 'photography', never film photography. It had been the standard. With the emergence of digital photography this customary has been challenged. My question is, "will digital photography become the standard or will it stay the ugly sister of photography"?
I suppose that it will always stay the 'poor cousin' of film photography unless 2 things happen:
1. All digital cameras want to develop to the purpose that they're equivalent in quality to that of the most basic film camera. They must eradicate the digital vs film debate. There must be no distinction between the two formats. The foremost expensive digital cameras are obtaining close to that commonplace however the point and shoot models cannot compete with their film counterparts. I think that with the pace of development, despite an economic crisis, customers are demanding that lower finish cameras would like to boost in quality. Though, true photography is all concerning the SLR and I suppose we have a tendency to are traveling to the standard needed to compete with film cameras.
2. There's a mindset amendment that amount is better than quality. Thought that went into taking a photograph with film has all however disappeared. The speed with which digital pictures are taken degrades the results of fine photography. This is often evidenced by the standard of pictures submitted to competitions, placed on forums and displayed on blogs. If this mindset changes and we have a tendency to start putting a lot of thought into photography it will bode well for digital as an art form.
How do we tend to modification this thus that digital is synonymous with photography? I personally assume that the secret's education and learning. In the identical way that digital photography has modified the face of photography digital has modified the face of publishing.
Nice learning material is out there in electronic kind as free education or moderately priced education. It's now low cost and easy to be told concerning photography and the techniques of improvement. It doesn't take an upscale course or diploma to radically improve your images. It's as straightforward as shopping for an eBook or an electronic course. Many have money back guarantees thus the chance is minimal. Simple to find and easy to learn. The secret's to learn photography and not simply digital photography.
When film photography was born it was perceived as an art and abundant care was exercised within the execution. It had been birthed in and developed with this mindset and, linked to the costs concerned, remained mostly as an art form. Even the masses exercised care in its practice.
But, with digital photography it's very different. What it has done is create the art kind cheaper, less complicated and faster. Whenever you add these three factors to something in life, it opens the door to loss off technique, lower quality and diminished value. This can be seen by the billions of electronic pictures that stay on DVDs, onerous drives and memory cards, unappreciated and valueless.
It's during this world that the art of photography has to search out its place and raise its head again from the chaos of digital. Digital is the most effective thing since sliced bread. The only query that now wants to be answered is can it rise to the occasion and become the new art form or can or not it's the vehicle that's accountable for the loss of a nice art type?
Author Resource:
Link :
Barbara K Howard has been writing articles online for nearly 2 years now. Not only does this author specialize in Arts Photography, you can also check out his latest website about:
HEPA Filter Vacuum Which reviews and lists the best
Commercial Hepa Vacuum
![[Valid RSS feed]](http://www.look4articles.com/images/icon_Rss.png "XML Feed For RSS"){kind=icon}
Category Rss Feed
Print This Article
Add To Favorites
![[Valid RSS feed]](http://www.look4articles.com/images/rss.jpg "XML Feed For RSS")