A smart set up these days is often higher than a perfect arrange tomorrow. Few people notice procrastination is the fastest approach to disaster when it involves implementing a Content Management System (CMS). The right metrics should be in place before you decide to obtain and implement a CMS.
Before a CMS purchase or implementation, key business goals and also the metrics used to measure those goals need to be identified. While not the correct metrics, a CMS cannot realize its full potential as a result of you will never be able to justify its cost. Like sails for a ship, metrics will ensure that content management is steered in the correct direction.
The most goal of any technology purchase is to allow users to execute tasks more effectively and so cut back costs. And the only method to grasp if you've reduced prices is to have a basis of measurement from which to benchmark and live going forward.
There is extremely no magic set of metrics applicable to every implementation in each organization. Each company, department and individual has different priorities; but with that said, there are definitely some common objectives to consider.
Metric 1: Speed and Ease of Publishing Content
This is most likely the most common reason for implementing a CMS. As you launch new product and services, you would like to be ready to quickly and easily update your Net web site; and your CMS must offer the capability to accelerate content publishing. Subject matter consultants (SMEs) want intuitive tools that are simple to use. Key Performance Indicators (KPI) here are money and non-financial metrics which will then facilitate measure the rapidity and easiness of the CMS' content publisher.
Metric 2: Quality of Data
Several organizations build the mistake of dumping an enormous avalanche of content on unsuspecting users. To reach attracting readers - and additional importantly search engines - the main focus should be on improving the quality of content. Data quality can be measured by allowing users to vote, rate, or investigate content. And any sensible CMS ought to be ready to have an effect on the workflow and promote that content primarily based on those ratings.
Metric 3: Productivity
Productivity is the metric that the majority organizations try to tie numbers to, but ironically it's also one amongst the toughest to quantify. Productivity measurements usually fall into one of 3 areas:
o Time: The hours, days, or weeks saved by users of the CMS in creating, editing, reviewing and publishing content.
o Technology: The rise in price from the CMS, versus a manual or legacy process that the appliance is replacing. For example, with a hosted Web content management answer the productivity of the IT employees increases because the shift from managing hardware and infrastructure of the CMS shifts to more mission crucial applications within the enterprise.
o Resources: Merely the higher use of your employee resources. Are your marketing resources higher used managing content rather than creating it? Or as a twist to the higher than example, are your IT resources adding a lot of price putting in software patches and upgrades rather than making new functionality inside the CMS to support selling?
Metric 4: Cost Reductions
A mix of parts contributes to the full value of owning a CMS. These components embrace license fees, training prices, maintenance costs, hardware connected prices and implementation costs. Organizations must clearly define metrics that capture information at a granular level for each of these elements, and the ability of the CMS to cut back costs at a holistic level. Keep this fully different set of considerations in mind when evaluating completely different types of content management systems; like traditional installed solutions, a Software-as-a-Service CMS, open supply, and even custom-built.
Metric 5: Net web site performance
Net site performance is by way the easiest to measure, with the utilization of any customary Net website analytics tool. Metrics will be designed around anything from increasing total distinctive web site visitors, to minimizing abandon rate on specific pages. The choices are endless, however the caveat here, like all these metrics, is to state them upfront and be able to tie business advantages to them.
Conclusion
Metrics are a concrete manner of defining what a content management project can accomplish, and whether it can meet those goals. For effectiveness, metrics should be (wherever possible) quantitative rather than qualitative. For instance, instead of having a broad metric such as 'Achieve vital reduction in IT costs", a a lot of defined metric like 'Achieve twenty% reduction in IT costs in the primary year' can be a lot of helpful.
Once the bottom metrics are established, organizations can study moving to the next level, defining metrics like share of sales achieved through the Internet site thanks to improved content quality, or improved lead conversion rates. It must also be remembered that metrics want constant review and revision where necessary.
This specialize in metrics provides much-required visibility on the impact of CMS on day-to-day operations. Metrics give direction and if used effectively, can communicate the immense value a CMS will give to increasing business opportunities.
Author Resource:
William Hill has been writing articles online for nearly 2 years now. Not only does this author specialize in Internet and Businesses Online, you can also check out his latest website about:
![[Valid RSS feed]](http://www.look4articles.com/images/icon_Rss.png "XML Feed For RSS"){kind=icon}
Category Rss Feed
Print This Article
Add To Favorites
![[Valid RSS feed]](http://www.look4articles.com/images/rss.jpg "XML Feed For RSS")