BAGHDAD, Iraq CNN has determined to printed Samar Saed Abudullan's death row case (along with others), not sure why, however it looks like Amnesty International has conjointly got involved. Before I purchase too much during this 'pure opinion,' article of mine, I am writing; let me tell you how I feel in a very flash flooded way. I belonged to Amnesty International once, and I always discovered after they got involved, they never told the public, or me the whole story, simply wished support from me, and everybody else. Therefore I've learned not to trust their knowledge all that much, nor their intent. And for CNN, I like their news, though during this case I suppose they are not solely slanted, but gullible, if not naive to require this as serious as they have.
The lady in question , Samar, is innocent, therefore she says, and in her case, who would not say the same. She after all blames her husband, who cannot voice his opinion because he has run off, as I would do have done if I used to be him, most likely. And do they torture in Iraq? Presumably, however where do they not? China, Russia and the nice recent USA, all torture, thus who will very know. Anyhow, the query might be, why did she keep with a man that dispensed killings? Why did she not report him? She blames the decide for doing his job, if you kill someone, you should not be absolve to kill again, and run back to the husband you protected during those so referred to as innocent days your husband killed at will, and you never notified the police about. If you're living with a killer, you are just as he's, not innocent. They assert Iraq has the 4th highest execution rate, not certain that one is the first, but I am all for it if it stops my neighbor from returning over and doing me in. Amnesty says '...such claims are not uncommon in Iraq,' nor are such killings, with the assistance of a spouse. They add, "(in Iraq there are) ...flawed trials and coerced confessions.' That's a plain statement, and then they imply '(these death sentences) ...failed to fulfill international truthful trial standards.' Here we tend to go again, whose standards? The west, the east or America's or Europe's, and if it is the UN's standards, no one very pays attention to them, currently do they. Therefore a standard in one country may suite the country, where in essence, it will not in another, or the UN's standard. As of nowadays, the planet is not fully polarized, that's if you are not a coke or MacDonald's hamburger.
CNN and Amnesty International seem to not like the thought of Capitol Punishment (that could be a personal opinion of theirs, and mine) which was reinstated into Iraq in 2004 legally, simply like in America, when it had been originally abolished in 2003--however they make a moral issue of this, when it's not, it's a self-governing issue of that country. And since then 270-individuals have been sentenced to death, thus their information banks say. How several individuals did the 270-criminals kill? Maybe 2270, or 10,000, who knows, they do not provide those statistics, as I expected. I additionally understand two of the women have their children with them, on death row (which is extremely a plea for mercy), this is smart, thus they'll say goodbye when the time comes, and perhaps they can teach them, killing is not a good thing.
Author Resource:
Adam has been writing articles online for nearly 2 years now. Not only does this author specialize in Iraq's Death Row for - Samar Saed Abudullan - CNN and Amnesty International Interfere
You can also check out his latest website about
![[Valid RSS feed]](http://www.look4articles.com/images/icon_Rss.png "XML Feed For RSS"){kind=icon}
Category Rss Feed
Print This Article
Add To Favorites
![[Valid RSS feed]](http://www.look4articles.com/images/rss.jpg "XML Feed For RSS")